Stability on Retirement Lists is country-level planning context from one World Bank Worldwide Governance Indicators observation: Political Stability and Absence of Violence/Terrorism.
The frozen evidence uses 2024 country observations from the World Bank’s 2025 Revision. It covers all 29 country codes represented in the current Retirement Lists catalog, but it is not city, neighborhood, property, or personal-safety evidence.
Stability is display-only. It cannot filter, sort, rank, qualify, score, compare, or determine Fit or hard constraints.
What the Stability observation measures
Retirement Lists uses World Bank indicator `PV.EST`, Political Stability and Absence of Violence/Terrorism.
The World Bank describes its governance indicators as composite measures built from underlying perception sources, including surveys and expert assessments. The Stability observation is broader country context about the indicator’s stated governance dimension. It is not an account of every event or condition within the country.
It must not be interpreted as:
- a city crime measure;
- a neighborhood-safety measure;
- a travel warning;
- a prediction of conflict or terrorism;
- a measure of property-specific risk; or
- an overall Safety score.
How to read the available fields
The frozen source record preserves several World Bank fields when present.
| Field | Reader-friendly meaning |
|---|---|
| Source estimate | The World Bank’s statistical estimate for the country and indicator. It is expressed in the source’s standard statistical units. |
| Source standard error | An indication of uncertainty around the estimate. A larger standard error means the estimate is less precise. |
| 90% lower and upper bounds | The source-provided range around the estimate after accounting for uncertainty. It should be considered when interpreting differences. |
| Source-provided 0–100 governance score | An absolute score placed on the World Bank’s 0–100 scale anchored to fixed reference points. It is not a percentile rank. |
| 0–100 score uncertainty fields | Source-provided uncertainty information associated with the absolute governance score. |
| Number of contributing sources | The number of underlying sources contributing to the country observation, when supplied. More sources do not by themselves prove current conditions or local safety. |
The 0–100 score is not a percentile
The workbook sheet used by this frozen artifact does not supply a percentile-rank field. Retirement Lists performs no percentile conversion.
The source-provided 0–100 governance score must therefore be labeled as an absolute governance score, not a percentile, percentile rank, or statement that a country performed better than a stated percentage of countries.
Uncertainty matters
Governance estimates are not exact measurements. The standard error and 90% bounds communicate uncertainty around the estimate.
A visible difference between two source values should not automatically be treated as a meaningful difference, especially when their uncertainty ranges overlap. Retirement Lists does not use Stability for Compare or rankings.
The number of contributing sources can help describe the evidence behind an observation, but it is not a quality grade and does not remove uncertainty.
Coverage and geographic grain
| Contract detail | Verified value |
|---|---|
| Indicator | Political Stability and Absence of Violence/Terrorism |
| Indicator code | `PV.EST` |
| Data year | 2024 |
| Native grain | Country |
| Catalog-country coverage | 29 of 29 |
| Unavailable catalog countries | 0 in the frozen artifact |
| Product eligibility | Display-only |
Coverage of all 29 catalog country codes means each represented country has a valid mapped observation in this frozen artifact. It does not mean every city has independently measured city-level Stability evidence.
Cities in the same country may show the same country context because the source grain is national. That value cannot describe local differences among cities or neighborhoods.
Source and freshness dates
| Date or identifier | Meaning |
|---|---|
| World Bank release | Worldwide Governance Indicators, 2025 Revision |
| Data year | 2024 |
| Frozen source asset updated | March 11, 2026 |
| World Bank catalog updated | March 18, 2026 |
| Retrieved | August 3, 2026, at `15:21:06Z` |
| Reviewed | August 3, 2026 |
| License | Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 |
| Frozen asset SHA-256 | `25a2f9eabb90b0092973392c0b31571aa58b691cc5786292e504b52f693e1eb8` |
The data year describes the observation. The asset and catalog update dates describe the World Bank files and metadata. The retrieval and review dates describe Retirement Lists’ frozen evidence process. None proves that current conditions remain unchanged.
Display versus decision eligibility
| Product use | Eligible observations |
|---|---|
| Display | Valid mapped country observations |
| Filter | 0 |
| Sort | 0 |
| Rankings or collections | 0 |
| Fit | 0 |
| Compare | 0 |
| Hard constraints | 0 |
Stability is contextual information only. It is not combined with violent crime, property crime, local risk, or another measure to create an overall Safety score.
The former overall-safety fallback has been removed. A Stability value must never inherit or substitute an overall Safety value.
What Stability cannot establish
This country observation cannot prove:
- current safety in a city or neighborhood;
- current political or security conditions;
- the likelihood, location, or timing of conflict or terrorism;
- crime exposure;
- property-level risk;
- infrastructure or emergency readiness;
- travel safety;
- insurance availability or cost;
- personal safety; or
- whether a destination is suitable for a particular person.
Country-level governance context can conceal substantial regional and local differences. Historical source evidence cannot predict a future event or replace current official travel and security guidance.
Retirement Lists is a broader retirement decision platform. Destination evidence is one branch, and Stability is one limited country-context observation within it.
What readers should verify
Before relying on Stability in a retirement or travel decision:
- Check current official travel and security guidance for the country and region.
- Review current national, regional, and local government information.
- Investigate the specific city and neighborhood rather than treating a country value as local evidence.
- Check current news and emergency information from credible sources.
- Confirm residency, insurance, healthcare, transportation, and emergency-planning considerations separately.
- Consider personal circumstances and obtain qualified professional guidance where appropriate.
- Review the source year and uncertainty fields before interpreting the displayed observation.
This methodology page is not geopolitical, travel, insurance, financial, relocation, or personal-safety advice.
Retirement Lists artifact and tests
`stability_source_observations_v1`
The Retirement Lists artifact supports mapping of 29 of 29 catalog country codes, zero unavailable catalog countries in the frozen artifact, retrieval and review dates, the frozen asset hash, display-only eligibility, valid-zero and fail-closed behavior, removal of the overall-safety fallback, and null percentile-rank treatment.
Sources and review
Last reviewed 2026-08-03
- WGI 2025 source-data workbook
The frozen 2024 country observations for PV.EST, including the source estimate, standard error, 90% bounds, absolute 0–100 governance score and related uncertainty fields, and number of contributing sources when present.
- World Bank Worldwide Governance Indicators catalog
The Worldwide Governance Indicators source identity, the 2025 Revision, country-level granularity, coverage through 2024, the distinction between standard statistical estimates and absolute 0–100 scores, the March 11, 2026 asset update, the March 18, 2026 catalog update, and the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license.
- World Bank WGI documentation
The composite-indicator methodology, use of multiple underlying perception sources, standard errors, uncertainty bounds, and the need for caution when comparing observations.