
Lisbon, Portugal vs Valencia, Spain for retirement
Budget scenario
Selected scenario: Couple
Adjust priorities
At a glance
Lisbon
Best fit
Stronger climate comfort
Consider
Estimated Monthly Budget (Couple) is a planning estimate; verify locally
Valencia
Best fit
No clear edge in this view
Consider
Overall climate comfort
Monthly cost
$1,816
Planning estimate
Planning details
Use: Planning estimate; not used to determine comparison winners.
Evidence: Hybrid
Reason: Budget Ranking Ineligible
Basis: Estimated
Source: Statistics Portugal / INE; European Central Bank; ERSAR; Eurostat
Data period: INE rent Trailing 12 months ending March 2026; Census 2021; ECB 2026-07-15; ERSAR 2025; Eurostat 2025-S2/2025-S2; ECB 2026-07-10; Eurostat HBS/PPP 2020; HICP 2025
How measured: Model-limited retired-couple monthly cash-spending estimate using the municipality 2BR rent profile, the separately sourced full household utility bundle, and Eurostat two-adult grocery, transportation, and out-of-pocket healthcare spending adjusted by the age-60-plus expenditure pattern, 2025 HICP, and ECB exchange rate. Renter property tax is not applicable; income taxes and discretionary spending are excluded; no model buffer is included.
$2,108
Planning estimate
Planning details
Use: Planning estimate; not used to determine comparison winners.
Evidence: Hybrid
Reason: Budget Ranking Ineligible
Basis: Estimated
Data period: INE EPF actual rent 2025; AEAT habitual rent 2024; ECB 2026-07-13; INE EPF 2025
How measured: Model-limited couple monthly cash-spending estimate using the INE actual-rent baseline adjusted by the AEAT municipality price index and disclosed 2BR size factor, plus INE EPF 2025 couple-without-children groceries, transportation, healthcare, and complete household utilities. The household-type source is not age-specific, so this is not presented as a direct retired-couple observation. Renter property tax is not applicable; income taxes and discretionary spending are excluded; no model buffer is included.
$687
Planning estimate
Planning details
Use: Planning estimate; not used to determine comparison winners.
Evidence: Modeled
Reason: Model Limited
Basis: Estimated
Source: Statistics Portugal / INE; European Central Bank
Data period: INE rent Trailing 12 months ending March 2026; Census 2021; ECB 2026-07-15
How measured: Statistics Portugal trailing-12-month municipality median rent per useful square meter for new lease agreements is multiplied by the midpoint of that municipality's 2021 Census weighted-median useful-area band for two-division and three-division usual-residence dwellings, then converted with the ECB EUR/USD reference rate. This row uses the T1 proxy: two divisions profile and 30 m² - 39 m² weighted-median area band. These are planning profiles, not observed bedroom-specific lease amounts. T1 and T2 are proxied by two and three Census divisions, the rent-per-square-meter source covers all dwelling typologies, and the dwelling-size distribution is from 2021. The published range preserves the full weighted-median area band.
$560
Planning estimate
Planning details
Use: Planning estimate; not used to determine comparison winners.
Evidence: Modeled
Reason: Model Limited
Basis: Estimated
Data period: INE EPF actual rent 2025; AEAT habitual rent 2024; ECB 2026-07-13
How measured: INE 2025 average actual primary-residence rent among renter households is the rent-exclusive national baseline. It is adjusted by the AEAT 2024 municipality-to-national habitual-rent price-per-square-meter ratio, by the disclosed 50 m2/70 m2 bedroom planning factor, and by the dated ECB EUR/USD reference rate. Model-limited planning profiles, not observed one-bedroom or two-bedroom rents or current asking rents. INE supplies a national actual-rent amount only for households with rent expense; AEAT supplies the municipality price adjustment but not bedroom count. Utilities are separate COICOP categories and are excluded from this rent anchor.
Healthcare
Not available
Why unavailable
Availability: Source unavailable
Evidence: Derived
Reason: Secondary Hrsa Primary Care Source Unavailable
Basis: Published context
Source: Source unavailable
How measured: No verified source-backed healthcare value is available for this row yet.
Very Good
Planning estimate
Planning details
Use: Planning estimate; not used to determine comparison winners.
Evidence: Modeled
Reason: Modeled Requires Reviewed Decision
Basis: Modeled
Source: Spain Health Ministry; INE
How measured: spain_municipal_facility_rates_v1: official municipal 45% hospital-bed rate, 35% primary-care-center rate, and 20% urgent-care-center rate with 2025 INE population; excludes travel, waits, quality, and specialties.
Not available
Why unavailable
Availability: Source unavailable
Evidence: Derived
Reason: Secondary Hrsa Primary Care Source Unavailable
Basis: Published context
Source: Source unavailable
How measured: No verified source-backed healthcare value is available for this row yet.
Very Good
Planning estimate
Planning details
Use: Planning estimate; not used to determine comparison winners.
Evidence: Modeled
Reason: Modeled Requires Reviewed Decision
Basis: Modeled
Source: Spain Health Ministry; INE
How measured: spain_municipal_facility_rates_v1: official municipal primary-care centers per 100,000, capped at 8 with 2025 INE population; excludes travel, waits, quality, and specialties.
Climate
4.7 / 5 · Excellent
Clear rating edgeData details
Evidence: Derived
Basis: Estimated
Source: NOAA/NASA source-backed climate component formula
How measured: Derived climate score formula v1: Summer Feel is scored from annual days above 90F; Winter Feel is scored from annual days below freezing; Climate Comfort averages Summer Feel, Winter Feel, and source-backed comfortable-months score.
3.6 / 5 · Very Good
Lower published ratingData details
Evidence: Derived
Basis: Estimated
Source: NOAA/NASA source-backed climate component formula
How measured: Derived climate score formula v1: Summer Feel is scored from annual days above 90F; Winter Feel is scored from annual days below freezing; Climate Comfort averages Summer Feel, Winter Feel, and source-backed comfortable-months score.
4.8 / 5 · Excellent
Clear rating edgeData details
Evidence: Derived
Basis: Estimated
Source: NOAA/NASA source-backed climate component formula
How measured: Derived climate score formula v1: Summer Feel is scored from annual days above 90F; Winter Feel is scored from annual days below freezing; Climate Comfort averages Summer Feel, Winter Feel, and source-backed comfortable-months score.
3.4 / 5 · Very Good
Lower published ratingData details
Evidence: Derived
Basis: Estimated
Source: NOAA/NASA source-backed climate component formula
How measured: Derived climate score formula v1: Summer Feel is scored from annual days above 90F; Winter Feel is scored from annual days below freezing; Climate Comfort averages Summer Feel, Winter Feel, and source-backed comfortable-months score.
4.7 / 5 · Excellent
Data details
Evidence: Derived
Basis: Estimated
Source: NOAA/NASA source-backed climate component formula
How measured: Derived climate score formula v1: Summer Feel is scored from annual days above 90F; Winter Feel is scored from annual days below freezing; Climate Comfort averages Summer Feel, Winter Feel, and source-backed comfortable-months score.
4.7 / 5 · Excellent
Data details
Evidence: Derived
Basis: Estimated
Source: NOAA/NASA source-backed climate component formula
How measured: Derived climate score formula v1: Summer Feel is scored from annual days above 90F; Winter Feel is scored from annual days below freezing; Climate Comfort averages Summer Feel, Winter Feel, and source-backed comfortable-months score.
4.1 / 5 · Very Good
Planning estimate
Planning details
Use: Planning estimate; not used to determine comparison winners.
Evidence: Modeled
Reason: Modeled Requires Reviewed Decision
Basis: Modeled
Source: Open-Meteo / Copernicus CAMS
Observed: 2026-05-18T17:35:06.466Z
How measured: Air Quality is scored from the 2021-2025 average of 43824 hourly Copernicus CAMS PM2.5 model values at the city coordinate. No nearby qualifying EPA multiyear monitor is available, so this remains explicitly modeled.
4.4 / 5 · Excellent
Planning estimate
Planning details
Use: Planning estimate; not used to determine comparison winners.
Evidence: Modeled
Reason: Modeled Requires Reviewed Decision
Basis: Modeled
Source: Open-Meteo / Copernicus CAMS
Observed: 2026-05-18T18:10:58.633Z
How measured: Air Quality is scored from the 2021-2025 average of 43824 hourly Copernicus CAMS PM2.5 model values at the city coordinate. No nearby qualifying EPA multiyear monitor is available, so this remains explicitly modeled.
Daily life
364 Mbps
Data details
Evidence: Observed
Basis: City-level
Source: Speedtest by Ookla Open Data
How measured: Weighted median of fixed-broadband tile average download speeds within city radius, weighted by tests. Observation window ended 2026-03-31.
381 Mbps
Data details
Evidence: Observed
Basis: City-level
Source: Speedtest by Ookla Open Data
How measured: Weighted median of fixed-broadband tile average download speeds within city radius, weighted by tests. Observation window ended 2026-03-31.
Comparison worksheet
Lisbon
- Monthly housing quote
- Drive time to preferred care
- Grocery and pharmacy route
- Neighborhood comfort and mobility
Notes
Valencia
- Monthly housing quote
- Drive time to preferred care
- Grocery and pharmacy route
- Neighborhood comfort and mobility
Notes
