
Mexico
Selected scenario: Local

Mexico

Best fit
No clear edge in this view
Consider
Overall climate comfort
Best fit
Stronger climate comfort
Consider
Estimated 1BR rent is a planning estimate; verify locally
$172
Planning estimate
Use: Planning estimate; not used to determine comparison winners.
Evidence: Modeled
Reason: Model Limited
Basis: Estimated
Source: INEGI; European Central Bank
Data period: ENIGH 2024 (fieldwork August 21-November 28, 2024); currency conversion July 17, 2026; ECB 2026-07-17
How measured: Survey-weighted mean paid monthly rent for ENIGH urban localities (2,500+ residents) in the mapped state, among all rented dwellings with one room habitually used for sleeping. This is a state-urban planning profile, not a city observation, Western one-bedroom equivalent, or gross-rent measure.
$136
Planning estimate
Use: Planning estimate; not used to determine comparison winners.
Evidence: Modeled
Reason: Model Limited
Basis: Estimated
Source: INEGI; European Central Bank
Data period: ENIGH 2024 (fieldwork August 21-November 28, 2024); currency conversion July 17, 2026; ECB 2026-07-17
How measured: Survey-weighted mean paid monthly rent for ENIGH urban localities (2,500+ residents) in the mapped state, among all rented dwellings with one room habitually used for sleeping. This is a state-urban planning profile, not a city observation, Western one-bedroom equivalent, or gross-rent measure.
4.4 / 5 · Excellent
Lower published ratingEvidence: Derived
Basis: Estimated
Source: NOAA/NASA source-backed climate component formula
How measured: Derived climate score formula v1: Summer Feel is scored from annual days above 90F; Winter Feel is scored from annual days below freezing; Climate Comfort averages Summer Feel, Winter Feel, and source-backed comfortable-months score.
4.6 / 5 · Excellent
Clear rating edgeEvidence: Derived
Basis: Estimated
Source: NOAA/NASA source-backed climate component formula
How measured: Derived climate score formula v1: Summer Feel is scored from annual days above 90F; Winter Feel is scored from annual days below freezing; Climate Comfort averages Summer Feel, Winter Feel, and source-backed comfortable-months score.
3.4 / 5 · Very Good
Lower published ratingEvidence: Derived
Basis: Estimated
Source: NOAA/NASA source-backed climate component formula
How measured: Derived climate score formula v1: Summer Feel is scored from annual days above 90F; Winter Feel is scored from annual days below freezing; Climate Comfort averages Summer Feel, Winter Feel, and source-backed comfortable-months score.
4.1 / 5 · Very Good
Clear rating edgeEvidence: Derived
Basis: Estimated
Source: NOAA/NASA source-backed climate component formula
How measured: Derived climate score formula v1: Summer Feel is scored from annual days above 90F; Winter Feel is scored from annual days below freezing; Climate Comfort averages Summer Feel, Winter Feel, and source-backed comfortable-months score.
4.7 / 5 · Excellent
Evidence: Derived
Basis: Estimated
Source: NOAA/NASA source-backed climate component formula
How measured: Derived climate score formula v1: Summer Feel is scored from annual days above 90F; Winter Feel is scored from annual days below freezing; Climate Comfort averages Summer Feel, Winter Feel, and source-backed comfortable-months score.
4.7 / 5 · Excellent
Evidence: Derived
Basis: Estimated
Source: NOAA/NASA source-backed climate component formula
How measured: Derived climate score formula v1: Summer Feel is scored from annual days above 90F; Winter Feel is scored from annual days below freezing; Climate Comfort averages Summer Feel, Winter Feel, and source-backed comfortable-months score.
4.4 / 5 · Excellent
Planning estimate
Use: Planning estimate; not used to determine comparison winners.
Evidence: Modeled
Reason: Modeled Requires Reviewed Decision
Basis: Modeled
Source: Open-Meteo / Copernicus CAMS
Observed: 2026-05-18T17:35:06.466Z
How measured: Air Quality is scored from the 2021-2025 average of 43824 hourly Copernicus CAMS PM2.5 model values at the city coordinate. No nearby qualifying EPA multiyear monitor is available, so this remains explicitly modeled.
4.7 / 5 · Excellent
Planning estimate
Use: Planning estimate; not used to determine comparison winners.
Evidence: Modeled
Reason: Modeled Requires Reviewed Decision
Basis: Modeled
Source: Open-Meteo / Copernicus CAMS
Observed: 2026-05-18T18:10:58.633Z
How measured: Air Quality is scored from the 2021-2025 average of 43824 hourly Copernicus CAMS PM2.5 model values at the city coordinate. No nearby qualifying EPA multiyear monitor is available, so this remains explicitly modeled.
98 Mbps
Slower by 59 MbpsEvidence: Observed
Basis: City-level
Source: Speedtest by Ookla Open Data
How measured: Weighted median of fixed-broadband tile average download speeds within city radius, weighted by tests. Observation window ended 2026-03-31.
157 Mbps
Faster by 59 MbpsEvidence: Observed
Basis: City-level
Source: Speedtest by Ookla Open Data
How measured: Weighted median of fixed-broadband tile average download speeds within city radius, weighted by tests. Observation window ended 2026-03-31.
Notes
Notes